Evaluation of community health workers programmes in Antigua, Dominica and St. Lucia - 1983; an analysis of questionnaires administered at policy, supervisory, and community health workers' levels
By: Holding-Cobham, Marjorie C | Standard, Kenneth L
Publisher: UWI. Department of Social and Preventive Medicine ; Mona ; 1983Description: 50 p; tblsSubject(s): DOMINICA | ANTIGUA | SAINT LUCIA | JOB DESCRIPTIONS | PARAMEDICAL PERSONNEL | TRAINING PROGRAMMES | HEALTH PERSONNELSummary: Outlines the activities and results of the evaluation conducted in three out of five selected English-speaking Caribbean countries, using three levels of questionnaires: policy level, supervisory level and community health worker level. Respondents were to answer questions based on recruitment and selection, job description, training, supervision, evaluation, inter-personal relationship, work schedule and job satisfaction. Analysis of completed questionnaires showed majority of respondents as being satisfied with the community health workers programme. There is an indication that respondents were dissatisfied with job description at the supervisory level. Monitoring and evaluation of community health workers programmes were done only in Dominica and St. Lucia. Low status and no possibility of advancement were cited as areas of discontent in respect of job satisfaction.| Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grey Literature | National Documentation Centre Caribbean Collection | 00175-XI (Browse shelf) | Available | 0290 |
Browsing National Documentation Centre shelves, Shelving location: Caribbean Collection Close shelf browser
Project made possible through Maurice Pate Award (1982) from UNICEF to the department.
Outlines the activities and results of the evaluation conducted in three out of five selected English-speaking Caribbean countries, using three levels of questionnaires: policy level, supervisory level and community health worker level. Respondents were to answer questions based on recruitment and selection, job description, training, supervision, evaluation, inter-personal relationship, work schedule and job satisfaction. Analysis of completed questionnaires showed majority of respondents as being satisfied with the community health workers programme. There is an indication that respondents were dissatisfied with job description at the supervisory level. Monitoring and evaluation of community health workers programmes were done only in Dominica and St. Lucia. Low status and no possibility of advancement were cited as areas of discontent in respect of job satisfaction.
General
There are no comments on this title.